Modelling habitat suitability of the Himalayan monal (Lophophorus impejanus) and its connectivity in the Himalayas
Abstract
The Himalayan monal Lophophorus impejanus is a montane bird exhibiting a seasonal migration to avoid harsh winter. However, the knowledge of the suitable habitat and level of connectivity across the range for the species is not available. To close this knowledge gap relevant for the species' conservation, species distribution modelling with presence-only data and relevant environmental variables was used to determine the range-wide distribution of the species. The distribution of the species is mainly constrained by habitat and climatic variables. The connectivity of the species was modeled using the distribution model output. The study presented a currently contiguous area of suitable habitat available for the species that are well connected with evidence of metapopulation in the range edges. The study also found that the current network of protected areas is not sufficient to ensure the connectivity of the species. Conservation of the currently suitable habitat is necessary to ensure the species is conserved.
References
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. and Kadmon, R. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa, and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43:1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
Bach A. J. and Price, L. W. 2013. Mountain Climate. In: Price, M. F., Byers, A. C., Friend, D. A., Kohler, T. and Price, L. W (Eds.) Mountain Geography. Berkeley: University of California Press, p 4184.
Batáry, P., Dicks, L. V., Kleijn, D. and Sutherland, W. J. 2015. The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 29:10061016. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12536
BirdLife International. 2016. Lophophorus impejanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22679182-A92806166. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22679182A92806166.en. Retrieved on 23 June 2021
Boria, R. A., Olson, L. E., Goodman, S. M. and Anderson, R. P. 2014. Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecological Modelling 275:73–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
Bradsworth, N., White, J. G., Isaac, B. and Cooke, R. 2017. Species distribution models derived from citizen science data predict the fine scale movements of owls in an urbanizing landscape. Biological Conservation 213:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.039
Chhetri, B., Badola, H. K. and Barat, S. 2021. Modelling climate change impacts on distribution of Himalayan pheasants. Ecological Indicators 123:107368.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107368
Das, P., Behera, M. D. and Murthy, M. S. R. 2017. Forest fragmentation and human population varies logarithmically along elevation gradient in Hindu Kush Himalaya-utility of geospatial tools and free data set. Journal of Mountain Science 14:2432-2447.
Del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. and Sargatal, J., 1994. Handbook of the birds of the world Vol II: New world vultures to guinea fowl. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, p 638.
DNPWC and DFSC 2018. Pheasant Conservation Action Plan for Nepal (2019-2023). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation and Department of Forests and Soil Conservation. Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dunn, J. C., Buchanan, G. M., Cuthbert, R. J., Whittingham, M. J. and Mcgowan, P.J. 2015. Mapping the potential distribution of the Critically Endangered Himalayan Quail Ophrysia superciliosa using proxy species and species distribution modelling. Bird Conservation International 25:466–478.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S095927091400046X
Dunn, J. C., Buchanan, G. M., Stein, R. W., Whittinngham, M. J. and McGowan, P. J. K. 2016. Optimising different types of biodiversity coverage of protected areas with a case study using Himalayan Galliformes. Biological Conservation 196:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.015
Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., Dudık, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
Fielding, A. H. and Bell, J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088
Fuller R. A. and Garson P. J. (Eds.). 2000. Pheasants: status survey and conservation action plan 2000-2004. IUCN Publ. Serv. Unit, Cambridge, p 66.
GBIF.org. 2021. GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org-/10.15468/dl.8npz2w. Retrieved on 24 June 2021
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. 2016. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and the Maldives. Bloomsbury Publishing, p 480.
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. and Jarvis, A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25:1965–1978.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
Jokimäki, J., Suhonen, J. and Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L. 2018. Urban core areas are important for species conservation: A European-level analysis of breeding bird species, Landscape and Urban Planning 178:73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.020.
Karger, D. N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R. W., Zimmermann, N. E., Linder, H. P. and Kessler, M., 2017. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Scientific Data 4:170122. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122
Kass, J. M., Muscarella, R., Galante, P. J., Bohl, C. L., Pinilla‐Buitrago, G. E., Boria, R. A. et al. 2021. ENMeval 2.0: redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species’ niches and distributions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12:1602–1608.
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13628
Liu, C., Newell, G. and White, M. 2016. On the selection of thresholds for predicting species occurrence with presence-only data. Ecology and Evolution 6:337–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1878
Macdonald, S. L., Llewelyn, J., Moritz, C. and Phillips, B. L. 2017. Peripheral isolates as sources of adaptive diversity under climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 5:88. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00088
Maskell, L. C., Botham, M., Henrys, P., Jarvis, S., Maxwell, D., Robinson, D.A. et al. 2019. Exploring relationships between land use intensity, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity to identify and monitor areas of High Nature Value farming. Biological Conservation 231:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.033
McCallum, H. and Dobson, A., 2002. Disease, habitat fragmentation and conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269:2041–2049. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2079
Minor, E. S. and Urban, D. L. 2008. A graph‐theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conservation Biology 22:297–307.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00871.x
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. and Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858.
Naimi, B. and Araújo, M. B. 2016. SDM: A reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography 39:368–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01881
Norbu, N., Wikelski, M. C., Wilcove, D. S., Partecke, J., Sherub, U., Tenzin, U. et al. 2013. Partial Altitudinal Migration of a Himalayan Forest Pheasant. PLoS ONE 8:e60979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060979
Pascual-Hortal, L. and Saura, S., 2006. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology 21:959-967.
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. and Schapire, R. E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
R Core Team 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Rai, R., Paudel, B., Changjun, G. and Khanal, N. R., 2020. Change in the Distribution of National Bird (Himalayan Monal) Habitat in Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas. Journal of Resources and Ecology 11:223–231. https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.02.010
Root, T. 1988. Energy constraints on avian distributions and abundances. Ecology 69:330–339.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1940431
Ruuskanen, S., Hsu, B. Y. and Nord, A. 2021. Endocrinology of thermoregulation in birds in a changing climate. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 519:111088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2020.111088
Salick, J., Fang, Z. and Hart, R. 2019. Rapid changes in Eastern Himalayan alpine flora with climate change. American Journal of Botany 106:520–530.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1263
Soldatini, C., Albores-Barajas, Y. V. and Pellizzi, B., 2010. Habitat preferences of high-altitude Galliformes in Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. Italian Journal of Zoology 77:347–353.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000903337909
Srinivasan, U., Elsen, P. R., Tingley, M. W.and Wilcove, D. S. 2018. Temperature and competition interact to structure Himalayan bird communities. Proceedings of Royal Society B 285:20172593.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2593
Thuiller, W. and Münkemüller, T. 2010. Habitat suitability modeling. In: Moller, A. P., Fielder, W. and Berthold, P. Effects of climate change on birds, pp.77–85.
Thuiller, W., Lafourcade, B., Engler, R. and Araújo, M. B. 2009. BIOMOD- a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distribution. Ecography 32:369–373.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600- 0587.2008.05742.x
Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Li, J., Peterson, A. T., Graham, C. H. and Guisan, A. 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions 14:763–773.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x
Xu, J., Badola, R., Chettri, N., Chaudhary, R. P., Zomer, R., Pokhrel, B. and Pradhan, R. 2019. Sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Hindukush Himalaya. In: Wester, P., Mishra, A., Mukherji, A. and Shrestha, A. B (Eds.). The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment- Mountains, climate change, sustainability and people, pp 127–165.
The Nepalese Journal of Zoology has a licensing policy that permits distribution, remixing, adaption, and build upon your work under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License. Authors retain the copyright of the contents published in NJZ and need to grant the right of first publication to the journal. It also allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., on their website) prior to and during the submission process (e.g., as a preprint), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work. However, authors need to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements with NJZ for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in an institutional book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
