Characterization and management of human-wildlife conflict in Judibela of Rautahat, Nepal
Abstract
The attitude of people towards target wildlife species plays an important role in determining whether the conservation plans be implemented. This study examined the analysis of human-wildlife conflict patterns and factors by utilizing data gathered from literature, government records, and a questionnaire survey. The study also evaluated the temporal and spatial occurrence of human casualties, crop damage, and livestock losses resulting from interactions with wildlife. Furthermore, the study assessed the local community's perspective on wildlife conservation as it pertains to the preservation of biodiversity. The Likelihood Ratio test was employed to establish the connection between socio-demographic factors and human-wildlife conflict (HWC) that shows an association between occupation and age groups with HWC. The study identified three primary forms of conflict between humans and wild animals: crop-raiding, livestock depredation, and human injuries. Maximum conflict incidences occurred in crop fields on average of (75.49%) in which human injury was recorded (66.67%) and Crop raiding 84.31%, followed by the settlement area (64.29%). A total of 87.13% respondents believed that wild boar is the most conflicted wild animal encountered more at night. The other reported monkey is the second most conflicted wild animal which encountered morning (26.73%), afternoon (27.72%), and evening (45.54%). The exponential decay analysis showed that the number of conflict incidences decreases with an increase in distances from the forest. The majority of respondents (86.15%) expressed a strong wish to conserve wild animals, recognizing their crucial role in maintaining ecosystem balance. Additionally, 93.07% of respondents indicated their intention to educate their children about the importance of biodiversity conservation. Despite their positive attitudes towards wildlife conservation and management, respondents also acknowledged the need for compensation in cases of losses caused by wild animals demonstrating their commitment to both sustainable conservation and practical considerations in wildlife interactions.
References
Acharya K., Paudel P., Neupane P. and Kohl M. 2016. Can forest fragmentation and configuration work as indicators of human–wildlife conflict? Evidences from human–death and injury by wildlife attacks in Nepal. PLoS ONE, 11(9):e0161717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161717
Attia T.S.N., Martin T.N., Forbuzie T.P., Angwafo T.E. and Chuo M.D. 2019. Human-wildlife conflict: causes, consequences and management strategies in Mount Cameroon National Park South West region, Cameroon. International Journal of Forest, Animal and Fisheries Research, 2(2):34–49. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijfaf.2.2.1
Baral K., Sharma H.P., Rimal B., Thapa-Magar K., Bhattarai R. and Kunwar R.M. 2021. Characterization and management of human-wildlife conflicts in mid-hills outside protected areas of Gandaki province, Nepal. PLoS ONE, 16(11):e0260307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260307
Bista R. and Song C. 2022. Human-wildlife conflict in the community forestry landscape: a case study from two Middle Hill districts of Nepal. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 27(6):554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2022.2046791
Ciocănea C.M., Sorescu C., Ianoși M. and Bagrinovschi V. 2016. Assessing public perception on protected areas in Iron Gates Natural Park. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 32:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.013
Derebe B., Derebe Y. and Tsegaye B. 2022. Human-wild animal conflict in Banja Woreda, Awi Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2022: Article ID 1234567. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4973392
Frank B., Glikman J.A. and Marchini S. (Eds.) 2019. Human–wildlife interactions: turning conflict into coexistence. Cambridge University Press.
Gore M.L., Knuth B.A., Scherer C.W. and Curtis P.D. 2008. Evaluating a conservation investment designed to reduce human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters, 1(3):136–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00017.x
Goswami V.R., Medhi K., Nichols J.D. and Oli M.K. 2015. Mechanistic understanding of human–wildlife conflict through a novel application of dynamic occupancy models. Conservation Biology, 29(4):1100–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12475
Hariohay K.M., Fyumagwa R.D., Kideghesho J.R. and Røskaft E. 2018. Awareness and attitudes of local people toward wildlife conservation in the Rungwa Game Reserve in Central Tanzania. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23(6):503–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1494866
Kurmi, S.K. and Koju, N.P., 2021. Spatiotemporal association of human-elephant conflict around Parsa National Park, Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Zoology, 5(1), pp.8-12. https://doi.org/10.3126/njz.v5i1.38283
Krejcie, R. V. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational Psychol Meas.
Linnell J.D.C. and Cretois B. 2018. The revival of wolves and other large predators and its impact on farmers and their livelihood in rural regions of Europe. Research for AGRI Committee, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels. Retrieved from https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/wt8m9d on 21 Jan 2025. COI: 20.500.12592/wt8m9d.
Makindi S.M., Mutinda M.N., Olekaikai N.K., Olelebo W.L. and Aboud A.A. 2014. Human-wildlife conflicts: causes and mitigation measures in Tsavo Conservation Area, Kenya. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3(6):91–98.
Mekonen S. 2020. Coexistence between human and wildlife: the nature, causes and mitigations of human-wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park, Southeast Ethiopia. BMC Ecology, 20(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00319-1
Mir Z.R., Noor A., Habib B. and Veeraswami G.G. 2015. Attitudes of local people toward wildlife conservation: a case study from the Kashmir Valley. Mountain Research and Development, 35(4):392–400. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00030.1
Neupane D., Johnson R. and Risch T. 2017. How do land‐use practices affect human–elephant conflict in Nepal? Wildlife Biology, 2017(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00300
Ogra M. 2008. Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum, 39(3):1408–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.12.004
Pandey S. and Bajracharya S. 2015. Crop protection and its effectiveness against wildlife: A case study of two villages of Shivapuri National Park, Nepal. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, 16(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3126/njst.v16i1.14353
Pant G., Dhakal M., Pradhan N., Leverington F. and Hockings M. 2016. Nature and extent of human–elephant Elephas maximus conflict in central Nepal. Oryx, 50(4):724–731. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315000381
Peterson M., Birckhead J., Leong K., Peterson M. and Peterson T. 2010. Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters, 3(2):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00099.x
Pisa L. and Katsande S. 2021. Human Wildlife Conflict in Relation to Human Security in the Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications, 3(2):98–106.
Poessel S., Breck S., Teel T., Shwiff S., Crooks K. and Angeloni L. 2013. Patterns of human–coyote conflicts in the Denver. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 77:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.475
Richard D., Emmanuel H., Franco P., Robert D., Machoke N., and Eivin R. 2014. Attitudes of Maasai pastoralists towards the conservation of large carnivores in the Loliondo Game Controlled Area of Northern Tanzania. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6(11):797–805. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2014.0746
Sodhi N., Posa M., Lee T., Bickford D., Koh L. and Brook B. 2010. The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19:317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5
Tamrat M., Atickem A., Tsegave D., Nguyen N., Bekele A., Evangelista P. and Stenseth N. 2020. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence: A case study from Senkele Swayne's Hartebeest Sanctuary in Ethiopia. Wildlife Biology, 2020(3):1–10. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00605
Thapa K. and Kelly M. 2017. Prey and tigers on the forgotten trail: High prey occupancy and tiger habitat use reveal the importance of the understudied Churia habitat of Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26:593–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1257-8
Wang J., Damerell P., Shi K., Riordan P., Zhu K., Wang X. and Yang J. 2019. Human-wildlife conflict pattern and suggested mitigation strategy in the Pamirs of northwestern China. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 72(1):210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.08.012
Woodroffe R. and Redpath S. 2015. When the hunter becomes the hunted. Science, 348(6241):1312–1314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8465
The Nepalese Journal of Zoology has a licensing policy that permits distribution, remixing, adaption, and build upon your work under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License. Authors retain the copyright of the contents published in NJZ and need to grant the right of first publication to the journal. It also allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., on their website) prior to and during the submission process (e.g., as a preprint), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work. However, authors need to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements with NJZ for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in an institutional book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
